csseditors
1,817
edits
Bergmann Water Tunnels: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Freshwater Tunnel No.3
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
==Freshwater Tunnel No.3== | ==Freshwater Tunnel No.3== | ||
[[File:Freshwater Tunnel 3 Workers.png|right|400px|thumb|''Two workers at the construction site of tunnel no.3'']] | [[File:Freshwater Tunnel 3 Workers.png|right|400px|thumb|''Two workers at the construction site of tunnel no.3'']] | ||
Third tunnel was considered in the 1970's and later approved for construction, the boring work on the tunnel began on May 26, 1979, under a new management of [[Jeff Walter]], and the project was expected to be completed in 1983. The tunnel was meant to house multiple hydroelectric power plants, built by Hammer Valley Hydro, and would be 7,2 km long, running from Ilanka to the Freshwater Tunnel No.1, however due to bankruptcy of the Bergmann Group in mid-February of 1980, only a small portion of the tunnel was completed. | Third tunnel was considered in the 1970's and later approved for construction, the boring work on the tunnel began on May 26, 1979, under a new management of [[Jeff Walter]], and the project was expected to be completed in 1983, after which the Bergmann Group was contract-obligated to provide maintenance for the next 25 years. The tunnel was meant to house multiple hydroelectric power plants, built by Hammer Valley Hydro, and would be 7,2 km long, running from Ilanka to the Freshwater Tunnel No.1, however due to bankruptcy of the Bergmann Group in mid-February of 1980, only a small portion of the tunnel was completed. | ||
The construction of the tunnel sparked several controversies, [[Greenwar]] has opposed the tunnel project since its conception, raising concerns about decrease in water level of the Lake Stalburg and the affect on the groundwater along the tunnel's path. The tunnel construction also raised some concerns among on-site management regarding the possibility of excavation work putting tunnel no.1 in danger of collapse. After the bankruptcy of the Bergmann Group, two workers shared insight into the poor working conditions, dangerous work site and rushed preparation work during the construction. | The construction of the tunnel sparked several controversies, [[Greenwar]] has opposed the tunnel project since its conception, raising concerns about decrease in water level of the Lake Stalburg and the affect on the groundwater along the tunnel's path. The tunnel construction also raised some concerns among on-site management regarding the possibility of excavation work putting tunnel no.1 in danger of collapse. After the bankruptcy of the Bergmann Group, two workers shared insight into the poor working conditions, dangerous work site and rushed preparation work during the construction. | ||